Skip to navigationSkip to contentSkip to footerHelp using this website - Accessibility statement
  • Advertisement

    The AFR View

    The AFR View

    Australia’s anticompetitive pharmacy regime

    The competition watchdog should also be analysing how Australia’s anticompetitive pharmacy policy settings – much like labour monopolies on construction sites and on the wharfs – are substantially lessening competition.

    Subscribe to gift this article

    Gift 5 articles to anyone you choose each month when you subscribe.

    Subscribe now

    Already a subscriber?

    The reverse takeover of Sigma Healthcare by Chemist Warehouse may yet win approval if Chemist Warehouse sells part of its store network in certain postcodes. The Australian Consumer and Competition Commission’s preliminary review raises legitimate concerns about the deal’s potential to “substantially lessen competition in pharmacy retailing”, and “lead to increased prices in pharmacies”.

    But the competition policy ironies here are glaring. Chemist Warehouse has disrupted Australia’s “community pharmacy” regulatory quasi-monopoly. Its business model found a way around the regulations restricting the location of pharmacies and banning non-pharmacists from owning pharmacies, which have prevented supermarket chains from operating dispensaries in their stores.

    Subscribe to gift this article

    Gift 5 articles to anyone you choose each month when you subscribe.

    Subscribe now

    Already a subscriber?

    Read More

    Latest In Health & education

    Fetching latest articles

    Most Viewed In Policy